Home

Rules

FAQ

Olympic Qualifying Standards

Chrono

PB List

The World's Greatest Competitions

Personal

Notes about me

Sito in italiano

Atletica leggera

e-Constructor

This is the last part of my research. After writing records chronology, I counted records made by every athletes and ranked athletes with more records by age.

I took into account all athletes active in 1976 and following years. So, for example, Willie Davenport (active 1963-1978) is there, Ralph Boston (active 1959-1972) is not there.

I had some problems with speed races (100-200 metres and 110 hurdles). There's a real case which explains them all: Poland's Irena Szewinska (1964-1980).

Her records strip on 100 metres with electric timing is as follows:

Capture: 8 is the number of records she broke in her career; after her name and her birth year I wrote the ages of her 8 records.
In 1972 Irena was 26 years old. What about her before? We have to look at her hand timed performances:

(I didn't count her beaten records because after 1976 hand timed lists were no longer updated)

Let's put them together and have a look:

Something matches and something doesn't.

Matching ages: 22, 27, 28 and 30 years. Szewinska was the first both in hand and in electric list.

Not matching ages:

1. Records at 19 and 21 years of age, scored when electric chrono wasn't official. So Szewinska could not score any electric records at that age.This means Szewinska holds two more records by age: 19 years (1965) and 21 years (1967);
2. Records at more than 30 years of age, that is scored after 1976, when hand timing was set apart for good in official races. It's simple up to this point, I suppose. Here comes the hardest part:
3. Records at 26 (1972) and 29 years (1975). What has happened? Szewinska scored a new record only in electric list.

Irena Szewinska did 11.33 in 1972 at 26, thus setting a new age record. But at the same age, in 1970 Chi Cheng (Taiwan, 1944) ran 11.0 hand timed. What am I to do? Who's the age record owner? I thought to apply IAAF rule which says that, to compare hand timing and electric timing on 100 metres, 0.24 seconds have to be added to hand timing. Adding 0.24 to 11.0 I have 11.24, which is still better than Szewinska's 11.33. Thus I take off the record to Szewinska and assigned it to Chi Cheng (the Taiwanese held this record until 1976, when Annegret Richter of FRG did 11.01 and 10.8).
I applied the same rule on 1975 record: Szewinska did 11.23 at 29 (new record by age). Three years before Eva Gleskova for Tchekoslovakia did 11.0 hand timed. After IAAF rule the record, this time, was Szewinska's.

Now, let's have a look again about Szewinska's records strips:

"26" is red to show that it's not a record by age.

Now I can number all Szewinska's records on 100 metres. They are 10. As you can see from the first left column (6 and 8) neither electric table nor hand table, alone, are enough: number 10 emerges only from their comparison.

Greg Foster vs. Rodney Milburn

I said Irena Szewinska's story explains all problems I met during my research about the period 1972-1976. It's not just like that. A last case happened to hurdler Greg Foster, who ran 13.28 in 1979, setting the age record at 21 (he bettered a 13.42 of 1968). I forgot on the contrary that before, in 1971, Rodney Milburn marked 13.0, so Foster didn't improve Milburn's record. I didn't think about one fact: a post-1977 record can be cancelled by a hand timed record ante-1977, also if from 1977 hand chrono is no longer official.

To come to an end, here's an award to those who managed to follow me to this point: the list of all cases similar to Szewinska vs. Chi Cheng and Szewinska vs. Gleskova. Have fun and decide whom the record has to be awarded to! Issues